Archived Story

Raising student loan rates won’t solve problems

Published 11:00pm Friday, July 5, 2013

Thanks to Congress, getting a college education became even harder last week for millions of Americans.

Because Congress failed to take action, interest rates on federally funded Stafford loans jumped from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent on Monday. And for the more than 7 million undergraduates who rely on those loans, experts estimate the interest rate hike is the equivalent of a $1,000 a year tax hike.

And $1,000 to a struggling undergrad or recent college grad in search of job? Well, that’s a nail in the financial coffin.

Sadly, Congress could have taken action to prevent this increase, but members failed to act, leaving our college students who depend on these loans paying the price.

There is hope. Two bills pending now could reverse the increase, if action is taken by the end of the month. One would freeze rates for a year and the other would hold rates at 3.4 percent for two years. Offering a longer reprieve to struggling students. Either merits consideration.

In our struggling economy, with jobs at a premium and millions of college graduates unemployed or underemployed, raising interest rates on student loans seems like a cheap shot. Our nation’s financial problems won’t be solved by raising rates on student loans, but we sure can take another step backwards by penalizing students by raising interest rates.

Surely Congress can find more effective approaches to righting our fiscal ship.

 

  • Observer

    A better way to right the financial ship would be to eliminate all federal aid to education.

    The state and federal governments have thrown money into education since World War II and the result has been the price of education rising while quality has virtually disappeared. One does not have to look far to see what happens to the money that is thrown at education – new mega-million-dollar arenas, empty stadiums, elaborate dining facilities, exponential growth in administrative positions and salaries, and a slavish devotion to spending whatever it takes to buy championships in athletics.

    If public schools were allowed to let incapable and unmotivated students leave and colleges required to hold some standards for admission (a GPA v PPG, ERA, etc.) a better education could be provided to those who could benefit from it, at a lower cost, while freeing many “students” for honorable vocations.

    Report comment

    • henrimasters

      Observer you obviously do not understand how the funding works. “One does not have to look far to see what happens to the money that is thrown at education – new mega-million-dollar arenas, empty stadiums, elaborate dining facilities” Not funded by public money.

      “exponential growth in administrative positions and salaries” Required to deal with government mandates for accountability and the need for non-academic professionals to come in at private market rates to run institutions in a fiscally responsible manner while understanding how to market the same.

      “and a slavish devotion to spending whatever it takes to buy championships in athletics.” Refer to reply one.

      “If public schools were allowed to let incapable and unmotivated students leave and colleges required to hold some standards for admission (a GPA v PPG, ERA, etc.) a better education could be provided to those who could benefit from it, at a lower cost, while freeing many “students” for honorable vocations.” I completely agree! Problem is that the vocations no longer support that population. The solid blue collar society is gone. It went with NAFTA and deregulation of private industry.

      I read and respect your comments here but wanted to weigh in on some of your misconceptions. Maybe the Chancellor has jaded opinions and perceptions in Troy for too long.

      Report comment

Editor's Picks