Print this story |
E-mail story |
This story has 5 comments Add your own |
iPod friendly | Bookmark this
What is this?
Sometimes growth means stepping on toes
Published Tuesday, September 23, 2008
There are many people in this world I do not envy — at the moment Ben Bernanke and Henry Paulson would be chief among them.
But also near the top of the list are the members of Troy’s planning commission and board of adjustments.
Of all the myriad civic and governmental meetings I’ve attended as a reporter over the last few years, some of the most intense, emotional and frankly vitriolic have been before those two boards.
That emotions run high at those meetings should be no surprise. If an issue is going before the planning commission or board of adjustment it means somebody wants a change — either to zoning or a variance to building regulations — and we all know how much people like change.
If you want to see a neighborhood get united, just try to build something there the residents do not want. You will see neighbors who have not spoken in 10 years standing arm-in-arm in opposition.
Sometimes the issues are relatively small — somebody wants to put a trailer by his or her house or install another driveway or build a helicopter landing pad. (OK, I made that last one up.) Sometimes the issues are big, like rezoning requests for apartment complexes and other major developments.
In either case the issue is a big deal to the people it will affect, and residents will often show up in force to protest. The developer or property owners will give an equally impassioned defense.
Somehow the planning commission or board of adjustments members are supposed to make an objective decision amid all that emotion, and usually I can predict the outcome. Never have I seen either body approve a request over widespread opposition from residents.
I have heard board members often say that they do not want to force a change onto a neighborhood that clearly does not want it. There is a certain logic to that, but is it a rationale that holds up in every case? Are residents always right?
Last Thursday’s board of adjustment meeting saw a typically impassioned group of residents protesting the development of assisted living apartments near Corman Avenue.
The developers had been before the planning commission last month seeking a high-density rezoning for the project. Residents opposed because a zoning change would allow any type of high-density development in the future. The planning commission concurred and denied the zoning change, but said they would back the developers’ bid to seek a one-time only variance from the board of adjustments.
But at the board of adjustments meeting residents again voiced opposition, seeking limits on the types and ages of the facilities tenants and wanting the facility to have only one entrance.
The frustrated developers withdrew the proposal before the board could take any action. The board of adjustments cannot make the developers bring the proposal back to the table, but if it resurfaces the project is worth another look.
The residents were concerned about how much extra traffic two entrances would bring to Corman Avenue, but how many cars will be going in and out of an assisted living facility?
Besides, with the current zoning in the area, the developers can put in duplexes and fill them with college students (gasp!), a change that area residents would loath even more than assisted living apartments.
Troy is growing, and to sustain that growth the city will need a variety of housing opportunities for many different types of people — not just single families looking to buy homes.
That means we need assisted living facilities and, yes, apartments for college students. There are ways to build some such projects within the city’s current zoning plan, but it’s inevitable that viable and needed housing projects will come up that require variances or changes in zoning. Some people will oppose those changes — maybe even a lot of people — but if it will benefit the city in the long run to make the changes, then the board of adjustments and planning commission will have to be willing to hurt some feelings.
Residents have a right to voice their concerns about changes imposed on their neighborhoods, and it is incumbent on the board of adjustments and planning commission to weigh those concerns carefully. But it is not their jobs to make everyone happy. Troy‘s future housing needs will require changes, even if they are painful for some.
For a glimpse of Troy’s future, look no further than the new comprehensive community master plan being developed. It contains goals to preserve some traditional neighborhoods, but there are plans to revitalize and make changes in others.
Not everything in the plan will come to pass, but what does will arouse concerns in some. (Here’s looking at Highland Avenue.)
The board of adjustments and planning commission will face tough decisions in the future and members will have to weigh a variety of often-conflicting concerns in making their decisions. No mater how they vote, someone will feel wronged.
So I don’t envy them. But I hope both boards will have the foresight to make decisions that will help Troy grow and thrive, even it means stepping on toes. Lots of toes.
Matt Clower is news editor of The Messenger. He can be reached at 670-6323 or matt.clower@troymessenger.com.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE THIS STORY?





Comments
Posted by Observer22 (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 7:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The major function of zoning is to maintain the character of neighborhoods against "progress". Troy State's enrollment is growing and some think the city is obligated to make apartments available to the cash cows. But, if hog farming suddenly became vastly profitable would progress demand that we allow hog farms to be accepted into family residential neighborhoods?
If more apartments are needed there is plenty of land on the outskirts of town and in the county the developers could buy and use to provide them - - it is not necessary or desirable that existing residents be forced to move just to make a place for transients.
Zoning issues are emotional because for the great majority the home is the single greatest investment and an investment which goes far beyond the money involved. Developers are looking only at the almighty dollar and have no intention of living in the neighborhood in which they seek to build.
Posted by turtle (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 9:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The reason it doesn't make sense to build housing complexes for college students out in the county and on the outskirts of Troy is because many college students do not have the transportation to get to campus. The university's buses have pickup points at apartment complexes within close proximity to the University. The University was actually where it is long before many of the residential neighborhoods sprung up around it. So, if people want to get technical the University was here first before many of the houses on Highland, University, and other streets. It is very true, people are afraid of change but change is inevitable and we have to either accept it and work with it or lead a very miserable existance blaming everyone else for everything.
Posted by zztrojan (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 9:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There are lots suitable to build apartments on Elm Street just waiting to be developed, that "neighborhood" is history. If you want to see the effect of apartment building on a neighborhood, just take a look at Elm Street and compare it to 20 years ago. I only know of 2 homeowners left between the middle school and the Troy PD. Why didn't the commission protect their interests? Surely they didn't want the noise, traffic and crime rate associated with transient housing developments! Homes mean so much more to their owners than mere numbers on an appraisal form and one complex of bad neighbors can trigger homeowner "flight". This is why we need a "good neighbor ordinance" like so many other college towns have drafted:
http://www.purdueexponent.org/city/publi...
Posted by Observer22 (anonymous) on September 24, 2008 at 7:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Troy State was originally in Orion and later moved downtown...by Turtle's reasoning the apartments ought to be built in Orion where there is plenty of room or in some of the vacant buildings downtown.
The indians were here long before Troy State, perhaps Troy State should consider erecting Teepee's on the golf course to house. There we go! Chinese and Vietnamese communist students living in indian dwellings at a State College in South Alabama. . . George Wallace must be spinning in his grave.
If students lack transportation Troy State should invest in more dorms instead of a new basketball arena and parking deck.
Posted by turtle (anonymous) on September 25, 2008 at 9:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Yes Troy Normal School was in those locations first but they've been where they are now long before many of the houses and neighborhoods were developed. I won't even get started on the rights of American Indians because that is one cause I strongly support and another topic for another day.
The funds that are being used were specifically allocated for the building of an arena. There has only been discussion of a parking deck, with no definate plans for one because the money isn't there. And, what difference would that make? Yes it would ease current parking situations but still many don't have transportation so a parking deck wouldn't be of any use to them. Those who lack transportation do live on campus and in the surrounding apartements such as Campus Corners, The Village, Elm Street Apartments, etc and take advantage of the shuttle bus. Do you think a shuttle bus is going to go to Josie to pick up students? Or to Little Oak? Or Springhill?
I agree, it has broken my heart to see some of the historic homes torn down on Elm Street and South Brundidge Street, buy many of them were not used for housing anymore but rather businesses. Look at Family Ties, the former Seraphim, Coonts Law Firm. They were all homes converted to businesses. How is that the college's fault? It's not. Those that were still housing had been converted to apartment duplexes too. I would love to see many things stay the same and places persevered but change is inevitable. Stewing over it only breeds more ill will. Instead work together and maybe some of these new apartment complexes being discussed can be built with a historic look for the area to preserve the beauty of the district?
Post a comment (Terms of Use Policy)
(Requires free registration.)