Archived Story

Graduation rates below state average

Published 11:00pm Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Editor’s note: This is the first in a series of articles exploring the graduation rates and what they mean for local schools. Coming Friday: Why are students not graduating on time? Coming Saturday: How are schools held accountable?

Graduation rates at all three high schools in Pike County fell short of state averages for 2011-2012, and superintendents from both city and county school districts say they are concerned.

The average graduation rate for high schools in the state of Alabama for 2011-2012 was 75 percent, according to information released Tuesday from the state Department of Education. Locally, only one school came close to that average: Goshen High School, at 71 percent. The rate for Pike County High School, the second school in the Pike County system, was 64 percent.

The rate at Charles Henderson High School, the only school in the Troy City system, was 58 percent, a startling low number that Superintendent Lee Hicks said he believes is incorrect.

“We believe we have identified some errors with the reporting process and are working with the state (department of education) to revise those numbers,” said Hicks. “

We believe they may come up – maybe around 66 percent – but even if they do are we happy with that? Absolutely not.”

The cohort graduate rate, first used in 2010-2011, tracks a group of students ¬from ninth-grade enrollment through 12th grade and measures the number of students who graduate on time with their class.

The formula used to determine the rate essentially adds in any students who transfer into the class during the four-year period and subtracts any students who transfer out of the class during that period who enrolls in another school. Students who drop out, fail a grade, miss a year of school for personal or health issues, or who seek GEDs are not counted as graduates and negatively impact the graduation rate calculation.

“This is more of a lockstep measure,” said Michael Sibley, director of communications for the state department of education. “You’re judged by the people who start the ninth grade together and who graduate the 12th grade together, with no exceptions.”

Prior to the adoption of the cohort rate by the National Governors Association, states used a variety of measures and criteria in calculating graduation and/or dropout rates, making true comparisons difficult. However, because of the “more rigid definition” the new formula caused rates to drop for many states, including Alabama. “We went from the 80-something percent down to the low 70s,” Sibley said. “But it’s better to do it that way and have a real, natural comparable rate.”

Administrators at both school systems expressed concerns about the formula used to determine the cohort rate, particularly as schools are held accountable for factors beyond their control.

“I think we’re doing a much better job with graduating our students than we’ve done in the past,” said Dr. Mark Bazzell, superintendent of the Pike County Schools. “We’re heading the right direction, but we’re never going to be completely satisfied with those numbers.”

Bazzell said one of the “frustrations” with the graduation rate measure is that it’s one over which districts have the least control. “Kids drop out or fail to graduate for reasons beyond the control of the school system,” he said, citing socio-economic struggles; health issues; or other concerns.

The challenge for Pike County Schools is to identify the at-risk or struggling students early in the process. “We try to identify those students and provide supportive services … at any point, any grade when a student starts struggling we identify them and try to provide special assistance. But a lot of times, it’s not an academic issue.”

Hicks echoed Bazzell’s concerns. “Under the old graduation rate formula, we just had to make sure your son graduated,” he said. Now, the cohort formula measures if students graduate on time with their class.

“What happens if you have a kid who has cancer and can’t come to school for a year, or if you have kids who fail a grade and have to repeat it?” Hicks said. “There are so many ‘what-ifs.’”

Added to those concerns for Troy City Schools are errors in data reporting that Hicks said skewed the rates reported this week. “We basically had some students who were counted twice (as drop-outs) between the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 reporting years,” he said. “We’ve identified those and communicated with the state department … We feel better after our conversation that the 58 percent will change, perhaps more closer to our internal tabulation of 66 percent, but we’ll have to wait and see how it all works out.”

Sibley said the state department has an appeal process, but he could not speak specifically to the Troy City Schools’ case. “I’m not sure what the timeline is,” he said.

Regardless of the final rate determination, Hicks said the Troy City Schools must find better ways to serve the students are not graduating. “We will be putting several things before the board to address this,” he said.

 

  • Pauly D

    Hicks has a way of manipulating #’s to fit his desired result. Give him time to get rid of all the teachers that don’t bow down to him and he will be fixing grades (just like he did in Prattville) and the graduation rate will increase. The TES parents don’t care though because that are blinded by a little 4A athletic success. When the glory of that fades and they realize how much debt they are in and how far he has driven TES further into the ground, it will be too late. When all his buddies kids graduate, he/they will be gone and the rest of us left holding the bag for them.

    Report comment

  • Observer

    If there were errors which skewed the figures guess who is responsible for reporting correct figures to the state — the superintendent. So Hicks is saying his mistakes in reporting data make the system look worse than it really is.

    Report comment

  • southeastbama

    It’s funny to listen to Hicks and the superintendent of the Montgomery school system try to explain the reason for the low percentages. They are two peas in a pod in this regard.

    By the way, I have a question not related to the graduation rates. Yesterday the online issue of The Messenger ran a short article on the firing of Robin Snyder as head softball coach at one of the city schools…CHHS I think. It was just a few lines in length. (The Dothan Eagle posted a detailed article that include an interview with Snyder.) Today, the article has disappeared from The Messenger online issue. Maybe I have just overlooked it. Can anyone answer why it has mysteriously disappeared?

    Report comment

  • areyoukiddingme

    Hicks isn’t manipulating numbers or teachers in any kind of way. If you have been around the school and school system since he’s been here you would see the successes in classrooms and in sports. The sports successes aren’t going to stop after this year and neither are the academic achievements that were made this year since Hicks was here. The 2011-2012 school year and a miscalculation of things has nothing to do with Hicks at all considering the fact that this past school year was his first one with the TCS. The results of the graduating class this year will probably be around 75-80%.

    Report comment

    • Observer

      The football team, which had frequently made it to the playoffs in 5A managed to go three rounds this year after being reclassified as a 4A school. The baseball team, also highly competitive in 5A for many years (including the 2004 championship) ran the table in 4A. Neither had anything to do with the superintendent or principal.
      What academic achievements have there been since Hicks arrived?

      Report comment

  • Pauly D

    I don’t doubt the academic achievements will continue. Not hard to graduate 58%. I am confident TCS can replicate that achievement. Hicks supporters always have any excuse for why this result or that report isn’t correct. Typical government ran program – always an excuse for failure and think spending money on new buildings or technology will improve results.

    Report comment

  • areyoukiddingme

    The academic achievements are much better than that since there was a miscalculation first of all and second of all this wasn’t this past year it was the year before which makes all these anti hicks supporters sound ignorant when there blaming this low graduation number on him when he wasn’t even here. The 2012-2013 term was his first year with the TCS so how is this his problem?

    Report comment

    • Observer

      This is June 2013. The school year which just ended was 2012-13 and it was Hicks’ second year. He was here for the 2011-12 year and his three-year contract expires in June 2014 after the coming 2013-14 year. Taking credit for athletic success he had nothing to do with while blaming his predecessor for his own failures Hicks supporter is starting to sound like Obama.

      Report comment

      • areyoukiddingme

        As i stated in a previous comment. If someone’s to blame it shouldn’t be the superintendent. He puts a course of study together and has a staff such as teachers and principals who apply these study’s to high school kids. The Alabama course of study is set up to be challenging to make sure kids are educated not just knowing enough to get by. There’s several different options in high school to take on getting an education that range from a regular course of study which is knowing the essentials for life and then there’s advanced courses of study that prep kids for college. If a student doesn’t pass or graduate on time it’s the students fault for not doing what they’re needing to do. Teachers, principals, superintendents, and so forth do there jobs the right way so whose fault is it if they don’t graduate? The teachers and administrators or the students?

        Report comment

        Report comment

  • Pauly D

    areukiddingme appears to have received a memo from Hicks or the mayors office advising of how to respond. cut and paste same response in 2 articles.

    Report comment

Editor's Picks